Improving food security in India through non-conventional plant breeding technologies

Authors

  • S. Mudhalvan Department of Agriculture, Kalasalingam School of Agriculture and Horticulture, KARE, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India
  • M. Robina Sanofer Department of Agriculture, Kalasalingam School of Agriculture and Horticulture, KARE, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India
  • C. Dharshini Department of Agriculture, Kalasalingam School of Agriculture and Horticulture, KARE, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India
  • A. Jeyashree Department of Agriculture, Kalasalingam School of Agriculture and Horticulture, KARE, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India
  • A. Kavipriya Department of Agriculture, Kalasalingam School of Agriculture and Horticulture, KARE, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India
  • P. Pandiyaraj Department of Horticulture, Kalasalingam School of Agriculture and Horticulture, KARE, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31783/elsr.2023.92297305

Keywords:

biotechnology, food security, plant breeding

Abstract

Previous reviews addressed that there will be 170 crore people on the earth by 2050 the rise in the average income in emerging India. Hence, it will be the greatest challenge to meet food demand future.  Aside from urbanization and land degradation, climate change also additional pressure on the food supply. These problems must be fundamentally changed because of their complexity and self-reinforcing nature. Crop improvement through breeding has been the main strategy for reducing poverty and increasing the food supply in India. New, improved crop varieties need to be developed for farmers to use to enhance food security. The biotechnological and non-conventional accelerated plant breeding methods that are not reliant on genetic engineering or gene editing are the main subject of this review. We focus particularly on the viability of short-term implementation by national agricultural research systems in underdeveloped nations. We contend that delaying the implementation of technology that can speed up reproduction is economically ineffective and supports the swift adoption of accelerated breeding techniques in the public sector. We recommend the employment of a technique called Rapid Generation Advance (RGA) as the most practical strategy for speed breeding in the public sector after taking into account a wide variety of considerations, including the economics of accelerated breeding.

References

[1] F. Ali, N. Kanwal, M. Ahsan, Q. Ali and N. K. Niazi (2015). Crop improvement through conventional and non-conventional breeding approaches for grain yield and quality traits in Zea mays. Life Sci. J., 12: 38-50.

[2] I. A. Jideani (2012). Digitaria exilis (acha/fonio), Digitaria iburua (iburu/fonio) and Eluesine coracana (tamba/finger millet)–Non-conventional cereal grains with potentials. Sci. Res. Essays, 7: 3834-3843.

[3] G. S. Sanghera and R. Kumar (2018). Prospects of non-conventional approaches for sugarcane improvement. In: K. Sengar (Ed.), Biotechnology to enhance sugarcane productivity and stress tolerance.Boca Raton: CRC Press.

[4] S. Ahmar, R. A. Gill, K.-H. Jung, A. Faheem, M. U. Qasim, M. Mubeen and W. Zhou (2020). Conventional and molecular techniques from simple breeding to speed breeding in crop plants: recent advances and future outlook. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21: 2590. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072590.

[5] M. I. Hussain, A. Muscolo, M. Farooq and W. Ahmad (2019). Sustainable use and management of non-conventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments. Agric. Water Manag., 221: 462-476.

[6] G. C. Phillips and M. Garda (2019). Plant tissue culture media and practices: an overview. Vitro Cell. Dev-Pl., 55: 242-257.

[7] A. Hussain, I. A. Qarshi, H. Nazir and I. Ullah (2012). Plant tissue culture: current status and opportunities. In: Leva A, Rinaldi MR (eds) Recent advances in plant in vitro culture. InTech, Croatia, pp1-28.

[8] G. L. Jiang (2013). Molecular markers and marker-assisted breeding in plants. Plant breeding from laboratories to fields. In: Andersen SB (ed) Plant breeding from laboratories to fields InTech, Rijeka. doi: 10.5772/52583.

[9] N. Hasan, S. Choudhary, N. Naaz, N. Sharma and R. A. Laskar (2021). Recent advancements in molecular marker-assisted selection and applications in plant breeding programmes. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., 19: 128. doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00231-1.

[10] M. Zou and Z. Xia (2022). Hyper-seq: A novel, effective, and flexible marker-assisted selection and genotyping approach. The Innovation, 3: 100254. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100254.

[11] Y. Wang, N. Zafar, Q. Ali, H. Manghwar, G. Wang, L. Yu and X. Ding et al., (2022). CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies for plant improvement against biotic and abiotic stresses: advances, limitations, and future perspectives. Cells, 11: 3928. doi: 10.3390/cells11233928.

[12] Watanabe, M., Ueno, S., Hasegawa, Y., & Moriguchi, Y. (2022). Efficient low-cost marker-assisted selection of trees with MALE STERILITY1 (MS1) in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) using bulk DNA samples. Tree Genet. Genomes, 18(4), 29. doi:10.1007/s11295-022-01561-y.

[13] B. M. O. Marchesano, R. Chiozzotto, I. Baccichet, D. Bassi and M. Cirilli (2022). Development of an HRMA-Based marker assisted selection (MAS) approach for cost-effective genotyping of S and M Loci controlling self-compatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Genes, 13: 548. doi: 10.3390/genes13030548.

[14] M. S. Rathore, S. Tiwari, M. K. Tripathi, N. Gupta, S. Yadav, S. Singh and R. S. Tomar (2022). Genetic diversity analysis of groundnut germplasm lines in respect to early and late leaf spot diseases and biochemical traits. Legume Res., 1: 6. doi: 10.18805/LR-4965.

[15] W. Yali and T. Mitiku (2022). Mutation breeding and its importance in modern plant breeding. J. Plant Sci., 10: 64-70.

[16] A. C. Udage (2021). Introduction to plant mutation breeding: Different approaches and mutagenic agents. J. Agric. Sci. (Sri Lanka), 16: 466-483.

[17] C. Gao (2021). Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell, 184: 1621-1635.

[18] F. Li, C. Jin, L. Zhang and J. Wang (2021). Hyper-recombinant plants: an emerging field for plant breeding. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 40: 446-458.

[19] A. Sharma, P. Srivastava, G. S. Mavi, S. Kaur, J. Kaur, R. Bala and V. S. Sohu et al., (2021). Resurrection of wheat cultivar PBW343 using marker-assisted gene pyramiding for rust resistance. Front. Plant Sci., 12: 570408. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.570408.

[20] M. A. Haque, M. Y. Rafii, M. M. Yusoff, N. S. Ali, O. Yusuff, D. R. Datta and M. Anisuzzaman et al., (2021). Recent advances in rice varietal development for durable resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses through marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Sustainability, 13: 10806. doi: 10.3390/su131910806.

[21] N. Chandrasekharan, N. Ramanathan, B. Pukalenthy, S. Chandran, D. Manickam, K. Adhimoolam and G. K. Nalliappan et al., (2022). Development of β-carotene, lysine, and tryptophan-rich maize (Zea mays) inbreds through marker-assisted gene pyramiding. Sci. Rep., 12: 8551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11585-y.

[22] J. Yan and X. Wang (2022). Machine learning bridges omics sciences and plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci., 28: 199-210.

[23] A. Nagamine and H. Ezura (2022). Genome editing for improving crop nutrition. Front. Genome Editing, 4: 850104. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.850104.

[24] Y. Li, X. Wu, Y. Zhang and Q. Zhang (2022). CRISPR/Cas genome editing improves abiotic and biotic stress tolerance of crops. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 4: 987817. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.987817.

[25] P. Y. Chung and C. T. Liao (2022). Selection of parental lines for plant breeding via genomic prediction. Front. Plant Sci., 13: 934767. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.934767.

[26] C. Anilkumar, N. C. Sunitha, D. N. B. Harikrishna and S. Ramesh (2022). Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review. Planta, 256: 87. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03996-y.

[27] M. Ahmad (2023). Plant breeding advancements with “CRISPR-Cas” genome editing technologies will assist future food security. Front. Plant Sci., 14: 1133036. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1133036.

[28] C. A. Wartha and A. J. Lorenz (2021). Implementation of genomic selection in public-sector plant breeding programs: Current status and opportunities. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol., 21(S): e394621S15. doi: 10.1590/1984-70332021v21Sa28.

[29] M. Gholami, V. Wimmer, C. Sansaloni, C. Petroli, S. J. Hearne, G. Covarrubias-Pazaran and S. Rensing et al., (2021). A comparison of the adoption of genomic selection across different breeding institutions. Front. Plant Sci., 12: 728567. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.728567.

[30] I. P. Sarethy and A. Saharan (2021). Genomics, proteomics and transcriptomics in the biological control of plant pathogens: a review. Indian Phytopathol., 74: 3-12.

[31] F. Jacquet, M. H. Jeuffroy, J. Jouan, E. Le Cadre, I. Litrico, T. Malausa, and X. Reboud et al., (2022). Pesticide-free agriculture as a new paradigm for research. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 42: 8. doi: 10.1007/s13593-021-00742-8.

[32] D. B. Collinge and S. Sarrocco (2022). Transgenic approaches for plant disease control: Status and prospects 2021. Plant Pathol., 71: 207-225.

[33] J. Weyen (2021). Applications of doubled haploids in plant breeding and applied research. In: Seguí-Simarro JM (ed) Doubled haploid technology, vol 1: general topics, alliaceae, cereals. Methods in molecular biology, vol 2287, 1st edn. Humana Press, New York, pp 23–39.

[34] Z. Hilioti, I. Ganopoulos, S. Ajith, I. Bossis and A. Tsaftaris (2016). A novel arrangement of zinc finger nuclease system for in vivo targeted genome engineering: the tomato LEC1-LIKE4 gene case. Plant Cell Rep., 35: 2241-2255.

[35] A. E. Ricroch, J. Martin-Laffon, B. Rault, V. C. Pallares and M. Kuntz (2022). Next biotechnological plants for addressing global challenges: The contribution of transgenesis and new breeding techniques. New Biotechnol., 66: 25-35.

[36] S. J. Curtin, D. F. Voytas and R. M. Stupar (2012). Genome engineering of crops with designer nucleases. Plant Genome, 5: 42-50.

[37] A. Bao, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, H. Chen, X. Zhou and D. Cao (2020). Genome editing technology and application in soybean improvement. Oil Crop Sci., 5: 31-40.

[38] S. Biswas, D. Zhang and J. Shi (2021). CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding. Plant Cell Rep., 40: 979-998.

[39] Y.-Y. Tan, H. Du,X. Wu, Y.-H. Liu, M. Jiang, S. Y. Song and L. Wu et al., (2020). Gene editing: an instrument for practical application of gene biology to plant breeding. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 21: 460-473.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Improving food security in India through non-conventional plant breeding technologies . (2023). Emergent Life Sciences Research, 297-305. https://doi.org/10.31783/elsr.2023.92297305