Variability, character association and path analysis for Annona yield and quality attributes

Authors

  • Jagruti S. Mahla Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar 385506, Gujarat, India
  • Nishit V. Soni Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar 385506, Gujarat, India
  • Pranay C. Patel Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar 385506, Gujarat, India
  • Ashita V. Patel Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar 385506, Gujarat, India
  • Jay P. Dasalania Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar 385506, Gujarat, India
  • Sarojini Roul Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, C. P. College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar 385506, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31783/elsr.2022.82229239

Keywords:

Annona, character association, fruit quality, genetic variability, path analysis

Abstract

The knowledge of genetic variability among the genotypes for yield and quality attributes is the utmost requirement for any crop improvement work. The eighteen Annona genotypes of two species were studied for five leaves and fruit morphological attributes and twenty-nine components related to growth, yield and fruit quality. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design in two replicates. A vast variability among the genotypes was revealed as seen based on the significant difference from ANOVA for all the quantitative traits. For morphological traits, genotypes showed variations for leaf shape, base and apex also for fruit shape and segmentation. The high magnitude of heritability and genetic advance as per cent mean was noted for most of the traits indicated presence of fixable genes and least influence of environment for inheritance. The results of the association analysis presented significant and positive association of fruit yield with growth and fruit morphology and fruit quality attributes at both genotypic and phenotypic levels. A strong influence of fruit traits and fruit quality related traits on yield observed owing to their positive and significant direct effects. The pulp/seed ratio, fruit weight, fruit per plant, total soluble solids, sugar content could be emphasize to discriminate the various Annona genotypes so as to utilize them for future hybridization programme to generate desirable genotypes for yield and quality.

References

[1] T. G. Albuquerque, F. Santos, A. Sanches-Silva, M. B. P. P. Oliveira, A. C. Bento and H. S. Costa (2016). Nutritional and phytochemical composition of Annona cherimola Mill. fruits and by-products: potential health benefits. Food Chem., 193: 187-195.

[2] Digital herbarium of crop plants (2016). Dept. of Crop Botany, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University. Available online: http://dhcrop.bsmrau.net/custard-apple/ (accessed on 19th June, 2021).

[3] M. C. Ankita, D. A. Peerjade, D. Satish, K. Hipparagi and A. M. Nadaf (2019). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) genotypes. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 8: 795-797.

[4] D. R. Thakur and R. N. Singh (1965). Studies on pollen morphology, pollination and fruit set in some Annona. Indian J. Hortic., 22: 10-18.

[5] J. L. Nag, N. Shukla and A. Qureshi (2018). Characterization of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) genotypes in northern bastar of Chhattisgarh, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbil. App. Sci., 7: 1700-1707.

[6] H. Anuragi, H. L. Dhaduk, S. Kumar, J. J. Dhruve, M. J. Parekh, and A. A. Sakure (2016). Molecular diversity of Annona species and proximate fruit composition of selected genotypes. 3 Biotech., 6: 204. doi: 10. 1007/s13205-016-0520-9.

[7] P. Bhatnagar, J. Singh, M. C. Jain and B. Singh (2012). Evaluation of landraces of custard apple (Annona squsmosa L.). Plant Arch., 12: 1045-1048.

[8] A. Hisham, C. Sunitha, U. Sreekala, L. Pieters, T. De Bruyne, H. Van den Heuvel and M. Claeyes (1994). Reticulacinone, an acetogenin from Annona reticulata. Phytochem., 35: 1325-1329.

[9] J. S. Strijk, D. D. Hinsinger, M. M. Roeder, L. W. Chatrou, T. L. P. Couvreur, R. H. J. Erkens, H. Sauquet et al., (2021). Chromosome-level reference genome of the soursop (Annona muricata): A new resource for Magnoliid research and tropical pomology. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 21: 1608-1619.

[10] T. Begna (2021). Effects of crop evolution under domestication and narrowing genetic bases of crop species. Open J. Plant Sci., 6: 049-054.

[11] G. M. Vinay, T. Sakthivel and H. L. Priyanka (2017). Recent advances in Annona breeding: A review. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci., 2: 1168-1181.

[12] P. Chaimanee and O. Suntornwat (1994). Changes in Carbohydrate Content During Fruit Ripening m A New Approach of Teaching of Carbo- hydrate Chemistry in Biochemistry Course. Biochem. Educ., 22: 0307-4412.

[13] H. L. Priyanka, T. Sakthivel, K. S. Shivashankar, M. R. Dinesh and G. M. Vinay (2019). Biochemical profiling of Annona species and Annona atemoya varieties. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 7: 257-261.

[14] N. Babbar, H. S. Oberoi, D. S. Uppal and R. T. Patil (2011). Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of extracts obtained from six important fruit residues, Food Res. Int., 44: 391-396.

[15] K. H. Jnapika, C. Sarvamangala, H. S. Kulapati, S. G. Gollagi, G. R. Sanjeevvaraddi and P. Basavaraj (2019). Morphological characterization of Annona species under northern dry zone of Karnataka. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 7: 2107-2122.

[16] H. Anuragi, B. T. Jain, H. L. Dhaduk, and S. Kumar (2017). Genetic association studies for fruit yield and its components and qualitative phytochemical screening in promising Annona genotypes. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 8: 222-227.

[17] B. D. Singh (2019). Plant Breeding: Principle and Methods. Eleven revised edition, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

[18] J. L. Nag, P. Singh and A.Tiwari (2020). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of fruit yield and quality related traits of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.). Indigenous accessions from Northern Bastar of Chhattisgarh. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 8: 3056-3060.

[19] B. Manochai, P. Ingkasupart, S. H. Lee and J. H. Hong (2018). Evaluation of antioxidant activities, total phenolic content (TPC), and total catechin content (TCC) of 10 sugar apple (Annona squamosa L.) cultivar peels grown in Thailand. Food Sci. Technol., 38: 294-300.

[20] M. M. H. Khan, M. Y. Rafii, S. I. Ramlee, M. Jusoh, A. Mamun (2020). Genetic variability, heritability, and clustering pattern exploration of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranean L. Verdc) accessions for the perfection of yield and yield-related traits. Biomed Res. Int., Article ID 2195797, doi: 10.1155/2020/2195797.

[21] R. Popat, R. Patel and D. Parmar (2020). Variability: genetic variability analysis for Plant Breeding Research. R package version 0.1.0. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/variability/variability.pdf.

[22] R Studio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC. Boston, MA: RStudio Team.

[23] T. M. M. Malundo, R. L. Shewfelt, G.O. Ware and E. A. Baldwin (2001). Sugars and acids influence flavor properties of mango (Mangifera indica). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 126: 115-121.

[24] X. Ma, H. Wu, L. Liu, Q. Yao, S. Wang, R. Zhan and S. Xing et al., (2011). Polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant properties in mango fruits. Sci. Hortic., 129: 102-107.

[25] D. I. M. Amararatne, W. A. P. Weerakkody and J. A. L. P. Jayakody (2012). Bioactive properties of fruit juice of Promegrante (Punica granatum) grown in dry regions of Sri Lanka. Trop. Agric. Res., 23: 370-375.

[26] S. Shivasubramanian and P. Madhavamenon (1978). Genotypic and phenotypic variability in rice. Madras Agric., 60: 1093-1096.

[27] N. M. Fakuta, I. F. Ojiekpon, I. B. Gashua and O. C. Ogunremi (2015). Quantitative genetic variation in gum arabic (Acacia senegal (L) Willd) provenances. Am. J. Plant Sci., 6: 2826-2831.

[28] M. C. Ankita, D. A. Peerjade, D. Satish, K. Hipparagi and A. M. Nadaf (2019). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) genotypes. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 8: 795-797.

[29] H. F. Robinson (1966). Quantitative genetics in relation to breeding on the central of mendalism. Indian J. Genet., 26: 171-187.

[30] R. W. Allard (1960). Relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environment. Crop Sci., 1: 127-133.

[31] H. W. Johnson, H. F. Robinson and R. E. Comstock (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soyabean. Agron. J., 47: 314-318.

[32] M. G. Usman, M. Y. Rafii, M. R. Ismail, M. A. Malek and M. Abdul Latif (2014). Heritability and genetic advance among chili pepper genotypes for heat tolerance and morphophysiological characteristics. Sci. World J., Article ID 308042 doi: 10.1155/2014/308042.

[33] D. R. Dewey and K. H. Lu (1959). A correlation and path analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron. J., 51: 515-518.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Variability, character association and path analysis for Annona yield and quality attributes. (2022). Emergent Life Sciences Research, 229-239. https://doi.org/10.31783/elsr.2022.82229239